Comments on: Simplifying Converters for WPF https://codingsight.com/simplifying-converters-for-wpf/ Blog for SQL Server DBAs and Developers Thu, 23 Sep 2021 07:58:52 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.2 By: Jerry Nixon https://codingsight.com/simplifying-converters-for-wpf/#comment-93 Thu, 31 Aug 2017 17:03:00 +0000 http://codingsight.com/?p=1863#comment-93 I think I would need to be convinced a little more before I would agree. With FCU we’ll see custom extensions in UWP, but I’m still not convinced any solution using strings is really simplifying anything.

]]>
By: Mike-EEE https://codingsight.com/simplifying-converters-for-wpf/#comment-92 Tue, 08 Aug 2017 17:09:00 +0000 http://codingsight.com/?p=1863#comment-92 Solid post. Please feel free to vote for actual, legitimate markup extensions in UWP so that its API can somewhat feel like it was made sometime in the past century:
https://wpdev.uservoice.com/forums/110705-universal-windows-platform/suggestions/7232264-add-markup-extensions-to-and-improve-winrt-xaml

]]>
By: Girish Thanki https://codingsight.com/simplifying-converters-for-wpf/#comment-91 Sun, 06 Aug 2017 05:54:00 +0000 http://codingsight.com/?p=1863#comment-91 I see no issues with using a normal converter, with Resharper declaring them and finding them isn’t an issue (No point introducing additional complexity or code without additional must have benefits).

]]>