Comments on: Simplifying Converters for WPF
https://codingsight.com/simplifying-converters-for-wpf/
Blog for SQL Server DBAs and DevelopersThu, 23 Sep 2021 07:58:52 +0000
hourly
1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.2
By: Jerry Nixon
https://codingsight.com/simplifying-converters-for-wpf/#comment-93
Thu, 31 Aug 2017 17:03:00 +0000http://codingsight.com/?p=1863#comment-93I think I would need to be convinced a little more before I would agree. With FCU we’ll see custom extensions in UWP, but I’m still not convinced any solution using strings is really simplifying anything.
]]>
By: Mike-EEE
https://codingsight.com/simplifying-converters-for-wpf/#comment-92
Tue, 08 Aug 2017 17:09:00 +0000http://codingsight.com/?p=1863#comment-92Solid post. Please feel free to vote for actual, legitimate markup extensions in UWP so that its API can somewhat feel like it was made sometime in the past century: https://wpdev.uservoice.com/forums/110705-universal-windows-platform/suggestions/7232264-add-markup-extensions-to-and-improve-winrt-xaml
]]>
By: Girish Thanki
https://codingsight.com/simplifying-converters-for-wpf/#comment-91
Sun, 06 Aug 2017 05:54:00 +0000http://codingsight.com/?p=1863#comment-91I see no issues with using a normal converter, with Resharper declaring them and finding them isn’t an issue (No point introducing additional complexity or code without additional must have benefits).
]]>